From: Perry G. <pe...@st...> - 2004-06-24 15:08:34
|
Rick White wrote: > On 24 Jun 2004, Todd Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 06:14, Curzio Basso wrote: > > > > > I noticed that when multiplying two matrices of type Float32, > the result > > > is Float64: > > > > I modified dot() and innerproduct() this morning to return Float32 and > > Complex32 for like inputs. > > I wonder whether it would be worth providing an option to accumulate > the sums using Float64 and to convert to Float32 before storing them in > an array. I suspect that one reason this returned Float64 is that it > is very easy to run into precision/roundoff problems in > single-precision matrix multiplies. You could avoid that by using > doubles for the sum while still returning the result as a single. > Rick > I definitely agree. I'm pretty certain the reason it was done with double precision floats is the sensitivity to roundoff issues with matrix operations. I think Rick is right though that only intermediate calculations need to be done in double precision and that doesn't require the whole output array to be kept that way. Perry |