Re: [Number::Format] Interesting issue in development environment

[Darren C. <dl...@se...>]

+1

On 10/12/06, Bill Ward <bi...@wa...> wrote:
> Unless there are no objections I will ask them to do this tomorrow.
>
> On 9/22/06, Bill Ward <bi...@wa...> wrote:
> > We can ask the SF.net admins to rename the directory.  That's one of
> > the things they're willing to do IIRC.
> >
> > On 9/22/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Well we could do one thing and that is take a snapshot of what we
> > > have done so far on sf.net.
> > >
> > > Then we could import all of Bill Ward's CVS history into sf.net CVS
> > > and then re-add our snapshot. This is a fairly well documented
> > > procedure on sf.net and when we do it we can fix the renaming issue
> > > and we would not loose much history apart from the commits made  on
> > > sf.net CVS, which we would have to redo.
> > >
> > > It is a long road, but it is doable - I am doing the same thing for
> > > the Workflow module any day know.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > jonasbn
> > >
> > > On 22/09/2006, at 2.33, Darren Chamberlain wrote:
> > >
> > > > * Bill Ward <bill at wards.net> [2006/09/21 17:29]:
> > > >> On 9/21/06, Darren Chamberlain <dl...@se...> wrote:
> > > >>> I noticed this when I was doing the CVS checkout, and used the -d
> > > >>> option:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   $ cvs co -d Number-Format 'Number::Format'
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think that will be the best option, since we can't rename CVS
> > > >>> modules.
> > > >>
> > > >> Actually the CVS module is named "perl" so maybe we could?
> > > >
> > > > We'd still need to do cvs add and cvs rm, which means that the file
> > > > histories would be lost.  It's definitely possible, of course.  You
> > > > might also be able to get a SF admin to simply rename the
> > > > Number::Format directory to Number-Format; one fo the nice thing about
> > > > CVS is that it's just files, so this will Just Work.
> > > >
> > > > (darren)
> > >
> >
>

-- 
(darren)