Re: [Number::Format] Release 1.60 (was Release 1.52)

[Bill W. <bi...@wa...>]

As I upload the old releases to the SourceForge download area, I am
discovering that the CVS versions do *not* match up with the release
versions after all.

It tricked me because the CVS version was 1.42 and the release was 1.52.
There's a tag in CVS called release-x-yy for version x.yy (but I
notice this tag isn't set for the latest couple of versions!) which
correlates the releases to the CVS versions.

Sorry for the stupidity, but I'm new at SourceForge and I've ignored
this pacakge so long I forgot how I was doing it!!

On 9/19/06, Bill Ward <bi...@wa...> wrote:
> I just realized - we already have a line that says "require 5.008" so
> nevermind all this business about backward compatibility.  Let the
> Test::More changes be commited.
>
> On 9/19/06, Bill Ward <bi...@wa...> wrote:
> > OK.  I thought I had granted you the necessary access to administer
> > the tasks system.  Let me look into it.
> >
> > On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > If that is the case, I say we wait a few days and try to eliminate as
> > > many as the reported issues as possible.
> > >
> > > I still cannot create tasks on sf.net, or perhaps I just do not
> > > understand how to, but else we could just go over the list I wroteup.
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell we are already two requests down :-)
> > >
> > > jonasbn
> > >
> > > On 19/09/2006, at 22.56, Bill Ward wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not sure how we would roll it back without access to the CVS
> > > > repository itself...?
> > > > Never mind ... let's just go to 1.6 as the next release.  Are there
> > > > any other low-hanging fruit type changes that anyone wants to make for
> > > > this?
> > > >
> > > > On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> > > >> Hi Bill,
> > > >>
> > > >> Well you do not have to use the revision number, I just expected you
> > > >> auto-incremented the version number based on the revision number, I
> > > >> can see now that this is not the case, we might as well call this
> > > >> release 1.52 or we could roll back to 1.51 and try again?
> > > >>
> > > >> I will look into writing a test for the patch.
> > > >>
> > > >> jonasbn
> > > >>
> > > >> On 19/09/2006, at 22.46, Bill Ward wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Damnit, the version number!  I thought it was automatically
> > > >> converted
> > > >> > from the CVS version but I see that it is hard coded.  So I guess
> > > >> > version 1.52 now has to include CVS version 1.53.  Ugh.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > As for the test, I like to follow the policy that any change made
> > > >> > should have a test explicitly designed to cover that change.  In
> > > >> this
> > > >> > case we could test both with and without the space in
> > > >> int_curr_symbol.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> > > >> >> Hi Bill,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> And we need to update the VERSION number AFAIK
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Well the patch fixed a problem with failling tests? - so that the
> > > >> >> tests are succesfull should suffice or?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> It seems as if there has been a glitch in the release of 1.51?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> jonasbn
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 19/09/2006, at 22.13, Bill Ward wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > To make release 1.52 I think we need to do:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > 1. Add release date to CHANGES file
> > > >> >> > 2. Update README file
> > > >> >> > 3. Add a test case for the patch which was just committed
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Will someone do #3?  I can do #1 and #2.  Is there anything else
> > > >> >> > I'm missing?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > This is the first time I've done a release via SourceForge
> > > >> for any
> > > >> >> > project so I need to learn how to do that.  I'm planning to
> > > >> >> upload the
> > > >> >> > older versions as a test.  Have any of you done that before?
> > > >> >> Any tips
> > > >> >> > if so?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > --
> > > >> >> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> > > >> >> > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> >> -
> > > >> >> > ---
> > > >> >> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > >> >> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
> > > >> chance to
> > > >> >> > share your
> > > >> >> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and
> > > >> earn
> > > >> >> > cash
> > > >> >> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
> > > >> >> > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> >> > Number-Format-Developers mailing list
> > > >> >> > Num...@li...
> > > >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/number-format-
> > > >> >> developers
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> > > >> > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> > > > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
>


-- 
Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/