Re: [Number::Format] Release 1.60 (was Release 1.52)

[Bill W. <bi...@wa...>]

OK.  I thought I had granted you the necessary access to administer
the tasks system.  Let me look into it.

On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> If that is the case, I say we wait a few days and try to eliminate as
> many as the reported issues as possible.
>
> I still cannot create tasks on sf.net, or perhaps I just do not
> understand how to, but else we could just go over the list I wroteup.
>
> As far as I can tell we are already two requests down :-)
>
> jonasbn
>
> On 19/09/2006, at 22.56, Bill Ward wrote:
>
> > Not sure how we would roll it back without access to the CVS
> > repository itself...?
> > Never mind ... let's just go to 1.6 as the next release.  Are there
> > any other low-hanging fruit type changes that anyone wants to make for
> > this?
> >
> > On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> >> Hi Bill,
> >>
> >> Well you do not have to use the revision number, I just expected you
> >> auto-incremented the version number based on the revision number, I
> >> can see now that this is not the case, we might as well call this
> >> release 1.52 or we could roll back to 1.51 and try again?
> >>
> >> I will look into writing a test for the patch.
> >>
> >> jonasbn
> >>
> >> On 19/09/2006, at 22.46, Bill Ward wrote:
> >>
> >> > Damnit, the version number!  I thought it was automatically
> >> converted
> >> > from the CVS version but I see that it is hard coded.  So I guess
> >> > version 1.52 now has to include CVS version 1.53.  Ugh.
> >> >
> >> > As for the test, I like to follow the policy that any change made
> >> > should have a test explicitly designed to cover that change.  In
> >> this
> >> > case we could test both with and without the space in
> >> int_curr_symbol.
> >> >
> >> > On 9/19/06, Jonas B. Nielsen <jo...@gm...> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Bill,
> >> >>
> >> >> And we need to update the VERSION number AFAIK
> >> >>
> >> >> Well the patch fixed a problem with failling tests? - so that the
> >> >> tests are succesfull should suffice or?
> >> >>
> >> >> It seems as if there has been a glitch in the release of 1.51?
> >> >>
> >> >> jonasbn
> >> >>
> >> >> On 19/09/2006, at 22.13, Bill Ward wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > To make release 1.52 I think we need to do:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1. Add release date to CHANGES file
> >> >> > 2. Update README file
> >> >> > 3. Add a test case for the patch which was just committed
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Will someone do #3?  I can do #1 and #2.  Is there anything else
> >> >> > I'm missing?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This is the first time I've done a release via SourceForge
> >> for any
> >> >> > project so I need to learn how to do that.  I'm planning to
> >> >> upload the
> >> >> > older versions as a test.  Have any of you done that before?
> >> >> Any tips
> >> >> > if so?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> >> >> > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> -
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> >> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
> >> chance to
> >> >> > share your
> >> >> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and
> >> earn
> >> >> > cash
> >> >> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
> >> >> > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Number-Format-Developers mailing list
> >> >> > Num...@li...
> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/number-format-
> >> >> developers
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> >> > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://
> > www.soccersiliconvalley.com/
>
>


-- 
Help bring back the San Jose Earthquakes - http://www.soccersiliconvalley.com/