Use of Runtime GPL?
Brought to you by:
jfalcou
Would you like to consider the "GNU General Public License with runtime exception" (RGPL)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html
How do you think about the details from the discussion "(L)GPL and C++ templates issue"?
http://groups.google.de/groups?threadm=4174046c%241_2%40news.bluewin.ch
Logged In: YES
user_id=1354334
Originator: NO
Hi,
the licensing of NT2 and its associated toolbox is currently unclear.
We initially thought that LGPL will be sufficent but it seems it is not.
Thanks for the light up on those pages, we'll adjust our license to fit in one of them.
I would appreciate further comments for the suggested adjustment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch01s02.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/commoncpp/
http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/wiki/index.php?title=General_Questions_about_TBB#What_is_GPL_v2_with_the_runtime_exception.3F
How do you think about the licence approach from a header-only library like "http://www.stlsoft.org/"?