Re: [Npfs-devel] two patches and a feature enhancement

[Tim N. <tim...@gm...>]

ack, sorry, I misunderstood.. I thought these were for ninefs, not npfs.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Tim Newsham <tim...@gm...> wrote:
> thank you.  I'll try to get those into the tree today.
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Mike Ryan <mik...@la...> wrote:
>> Three things:
>>
>> 0)  [enhancement]
>>    I wanted npfs to run in the background by default, but added in a
>>    flag for running it in the foreground.
>>
>> 1)  [patch]
>>    stat(2) fails on large files unless _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is defined to
>>    be 64, so this patch enables that in the right Makefiles.
>>
>> 2)  [patch]
>>    More subtle: when a file is owned by an unknown user or group, 9pfs
>>    was returning an error. I've modified it to return numeric UIDs and
>>    GIDs in that situation.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
>> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
>> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial
>> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
>> _______________________________________________
>> Npfs-devel mailing list
>> Npf...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/npfs-devel
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | thenewsh.blogspot.com