Menu

#1 spfs/npfs: problem with network mount directory listings

open
nobody
None
5
2010-01-28
2010-01-28
Anonymous
No

Moved from bugzilla.kernel.org (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15153)
-----------
Server
------

# ls
bin etc lib64 misc netinst repo selinux tftpboot var
boot home lost+found mnt opt root srv tmp
dev lib media net proc sbin sys usr

# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
59420764 11789992 44563688 21% /
/dev/sda1 101086 12539 83328 14% /boot
tmpfs 4089272 0 4089272 0% /dev/shm
9.47.xx.xx:/netinst 2113784992 1337307808 669103136 67% /netinst
/netinst/rhel5-5.4-rc3/x86_64/RHEL5.4-Server-20090819.0-x86_64-DVD.iso
3490018 3490018 0 100% /repo/0

Note: NPFS is the server running on RHEL 5.4

Client:
-------

# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32.6 #2 SMP Tue Jan 26 18:57:33 EST 2010 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost 9p_tcp]# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
..
..
192.168.122.1 on /9p_tcp type 9p (rw,port=2234)

# cd /9p_tcp
# ls
ls: reading directory .: Unknown error 526
#

# cd /9p_tcp
# ls netinst
ls: netinst: Unknown error 526
# ls srv
# ls var
account cvs games local mail preserve spool www
cache db gdm lock nis racoon tmp yp
crash empty lib log opt run tux

As you can see above, the netmount /netinst is the problem.
Comment #1 From Eric Van Hensbergen 2010-01-28 00:18:58 (-) [reply]
In the past this has been a kernel problem versus a client problem.
Comment #2 From Eric Van Hensbergen 2010-01-28 14:55:33 (-) [reply]
In reply to comment #1)
> In the past this has been a kernel problem versus a client problem.

In the past this has been a SERVER problem versus a client problem.
Comment #3 From JV 2010-01-28 17:52:46 (-) [reply]
(In reply to comment #2)
> In reply to comment #1)
> > In the past this has been a kernel problem versus a client problem.
>
> In the past this has been a SERVER problem versus a client problem.

Thanks Eric. Yes I confirmed that this is server related. I see it only on
SPFS.
Should I close the defect?

Discussion


Log in to post a comment.

MongoDB Logo MongoDB