From: Liam G. <li...@gn...> - 2006-02-28 19:16:57
|
Hi Mike, On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:57 +1300, Mike McGavin wrote: > Is this an appropriate place to discuss libnova? There doesn't seem > to be an obvious mailing list or forum attached to it that I can find, > and the project seems quite strongly connected to this one. If > there's a better place, please accept my apologies (and let me know). > This is the best place atm. > I was wondering if there's presently a documentation effort for > libnova, besides the Doxygen comments. I'm quite keen to attempt to > familiarise myself with the code and write some kind of getting > started guide to explain, in some kind of logical sequence, what > people need to do to use the library effectively. > We only have an examples directory atm. It would be nice to get some proper docs though. > I've been working on my own ephemeris library for a few months, > primarily as an effort to learn more about ephemeris in general. I > forked my own code from the Astrolabe project that was released ages > ago by Bill McClain, but I've also been reading up in several books > (including Meeus) to help understand what's going on. I launced my > own code as a GPL'd project a little while ago, but it's very > incomplete and somewhat buggy, and my main motivation was that I > wasn't aware of anyone else doing the same thing under GPL. Having > discovered libnova a few weeks ago, I've been wondering if it'd make > more sense to try to get involved somehow in what you're doing here > instead. > > I haven't thought this whole documentation thing through in detail, > but it's something I'd like to try in my spare time (which I'll > hopefully find) if it would fit the project. > > Any thoughts? > This would be very helpful, as the subject matter is very difficult for beginners to understand (it's even difficult if you have a copy of Meeus). How do you propose doing this ? Would you use doxygen or do you have another documentation system in mind ? Thanks Liam |