[Noffle-users] idea: "pipe" filter / procmail
Brought to you by:
bears
From: Dan J. <ji...@ji...> - 2004-10-21 19:39:24
|
In the man page action = full|over|thread|discard|default. Specifies the action to be taken if the filter matches. If not specified or specified as default, the action is as specified by the group's subscription mode. Better add some examples to show how a filter with action of "default" is useful. But never mind that. Introducing pipes. As we know, procmail is useful for incoming mail, but what about incoming news? Assuming noffle is the right place to do it. Then a new type of filter, "pipe <shell command>" would be useful. Probably mostly we would just "pipe procmail". That way when the occasional Pancake Club announcement comes along, we can extract any recipes contained therein with some script we wrote. Noffle must be the right place to do the pipe, just as exim, and not one's mail reader, calls procmail. I mean how can we not be able to process news messages just as handily as mail messages? Oh, and if our pipe filter fires, we should still also be able to say the message has not yet been "delivered", so we can have our pancakes and eat them too. I.e., still read the announcement. So maybe we should instead just have all messages optionally sent to procmail (with .procmailrc location customizable.) and use the return code to see if it has been "delivered" or not... Anyways, otherwise we must store those recipes by hand, no? |