Re: [Noffle-users] complete X-NOFFLE-Status list

[Jim H. <jim...@ac...>]

On 30-Sep-2004 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Well still sometimes there are articles with empty X-NOFFLE-Status's.
> I saw some for some filter action=over matching articles.

You're quite right. I just did a 'noffle -a all' and got several recent
articles with empty X-NOFFLE-Status, so I've missed a bit of analysis somewhere.

Oh, of course. If a group is subscribed in 'full', articles will be downloaded
regardless of their INTERESTING status. So, since I subscribe to everything in
'full', only the articles I've actually read should have an INTERESTING status.
I'll update the FAQ text.

> By the way, if a filter matches, maybe a header about it with details
> could be added to the message.  SpamAssassin adds them, matches or
> not, so noffle could perhaps add them for matches.
> 
> Jim>      INTERESTING
> Jim>      - This message should be downloaded on the next fetch, if it has
> Jim>        not been downloaded already.

> Any antidotes in case we accidentally cause "Garage Sale Last Thursday
> in Fergus Falls" to be marked INTERESTING?  Does tampering with
> var/spool/noffle/outgoing/* affect it?

Not right now, I'm afraid. Fiddling with outgoing will stop it being downloaded
on the next fetch (I think), but it will remain marked as INTERESTING and get
added to the queue again.

I really should do something about that. How does this sound - add a new
option,

        -U, --uninteresting <msgid>

to allow you to remove the interesting tag from an article and remove it from
the current requested queue, if on it.

I suppose

        -b, --boring <msgid>

could be a synonym :-)

-- 
Jim Hague - jim...@ac...          Never trust a computer you can't lift.