You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(90) |
Dec
(25) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(183) |
Feb
(124) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(19) |
2003 |
Jan
(119) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
2004 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(2) |
2005 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2006-01-24 10:42:03
|
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:59, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > I'll work on getting a properly fixed version released in the next day > or two. The new version has been released as 1.51 - it is available from our scripts page now. /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Dave C. <da...@us...> - 2006-01-21 17:45:00
|
Anthony DeCilio wrote: > Dave > I don't want to come across being rude, but I went thru the read me and > did the changes like I was told to and still no progress. I've > reinstalled many times so to make sure I was working with a fresh > version. and again, no progress. No when your talking about the path, > can you give me an example. Same goes with value. And as for the > server, I am using powweb as a server company. Sorry, to sound like I > am frustrated, but I am going to have to set this up for 5 other > accounts and I want to make sure I get this problem solved. Anthony, In the configuration section of the program there is a line that looks like this: $mailprog = '/usr/lib/sendmail -oi -t'; This defines whereabouts on your server the sendmail program is installed. The sendmail program is what formmail uses to actually send the email. You need to find the sendmail program on your server and change the path on this line to be the correct value. For example, the sendmail program on the computer I'm currently using is in /usr/sbin/sendmail so I would change the line to be: $mailprog = '/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t'; Only your system admins can tell you where the sendmail program is installed. If your system doesn't have a sendmail program (if, for example, you are on a Windows server) then you'll need to use the 'smtp:' version of $mailprog. In this version, instead of using sendmail to send the email then we use an SMTP (Simple Mail Transport Protocol) server instead. This is another server on the network which is configured to send email. Again, only your system admins can give you the address of your SMTP server. Once you've got that address you can put it in your program like this: $mailprog = 'SMTP:mail.myhost.com'; (where mail.myhost.com is the name of your SMTP server. I hope this helps. I'm really not sure how much clearer I can make it. Dave... |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2006-01-20 09:19:31
|
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:52, Makane Macoumba Keita wrote: > Hi All, > I want to if someone already did the implementation > of OpenSSL for a server which interact with the cisco > routers. I scratched my head for a little while about this, then I realised why you sent it to us. The NMS in the name of our project is just that a name (which is explained on the website) and bears no relationship to "Network Monitoring Systems" - we develop and maintain software for people to use on their web sites. /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Makane M. K. <dje...@ya...> - 2006-01-19 20:52:33
|
Hi All, I want to if someone already did the implementation of OpenSSL for a server which interact with the cisco routers. Thanks a lot in advance, Djely. __________________________________________________________ Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? magasinage.yahoo.ca |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-11-08 21:33:24
|
Bugs item #1351696, was opened at 2005-11-08 16:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425769&aid=1351696&group_id=39625 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: peter (pjaffe7136) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: syntax error in wwwadmin.pl Initial Comment: I am trying to get v1.6 to run but having trouble with the perl scripts. Specifically, I am getting an "Internal Server Error" when trying to run the wwwadmin.pl script. I tried to run it from the command line and got an error as well. After assuming that it was something I did to customize it, I unzipped the original and tried to run it from the command line. Same problem. Any ideas? D:\tmp>perl -TW wwwadmin.pl Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Use of uninitialized value in string eq at wwwadmin.pl line 175. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1- transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><title>WWWAdmin For WWWBoard</title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/nms.css" /> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><center> <h1>WWWAdmin For WWWBoard</h1></center> <p>Choose your Method of modifying WWWBoard Below:</p> <hr size="7" width="75%" /><br /> <ul> <li>Remove Files <ul> <li><a href="http://nms-test/cgi-bin/wwwadmin.pl? remove">Remove Files</a> <li><a href="http://nms-test/cgi-bin/wwwadmin.pl? remove_by_num">Remove Files by Message Number</a> <li><a href="http://nms-test/cgi-bin/wwwadmin.pl? remove_by_date">Remove Files by Date</a> <li><a href="http://nms-test/cgi-bin/wwwadmin.pl? remove_by_author">Remove Files by Author</a> </ul><br /> <li>Password <ul> <li><a href="http://nms-test/cgi-bin/wwwadmin.pl? change_passwd">Change Admin Pas sword</a> </ul> </ul> </body></html> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425769&aid=1351696&group_id=39625 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-10-21 19:58:35
|
Support Requests item #1334455, was opened at 2005-10-21 20:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1334455&group_id=39625 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gavin Scott (gavsco) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: close sendmail pipe failed Initial Comment: Hi I've looked through the archives, but although I can find many references to this problem, I can't find an answer. I have installed nms but keep getting the error " close sendmail pipe failed, mailprog=[/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t] at (eval 8) line 108 " I have tried substituting "lib" for "sbin" but it makes no difference. Any ideas? I'm not very up on this, so if you can make it jargon-free that would be great. Thanks Gavin Scott <a href="http://www.jazz-trio.com" title="Jazz trio">jazz-trio.com</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1334455&group_id=39625 |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-10-18 20:51:44
|
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 15:18, Konstantine wrote: > I am using TFMail v1.36 > NMSCharset.pm > NMStreq.pm > MIME_Lite.pm > > I was able to setup and run the program in no time thanks to clear instructions. Developers doing a superb job, thanks very much. > > The problem I am having is: > In the form I have two fields; sender and email. > > I am using default email template and I have following set in config file > > email_input: email > realname_input: sender > subject: message from {= param.sender =} > > and in the program > CHARSET => 'utf-8'; > > When the form fields contain non-ascii characters, in the body of the email all fields display non-ascii chars correctly as well as subject field in the header. But the realname_input in the header does not. The From field of email displays: garbled_text_if_nonascii [email_address] > > Any suggestions much appreciated, thank for your time in advance. > It might be helpful if you could send us the complete headers of the offending message, I think probably what you are seeing is that TFmail is a bit more strict with the characters that it allows in the comment part of the email address than it is with those in the Subject, although I'm surprised that UTF-8 characters in the header are displayed correctly at all as they really should be encoded as per http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html. Ideally TFmail should support proper MIME header encoding, or at least Base64 encoding for UTF-8, unfortunately this will require some developer feeling the urge to implement it - I have Cc'd the developers list in case anyone feels so inclined. /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-10-15 11:09:49
|
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 02:24, Jonathon Hill wrote: > I am a novice Perl programmer and web developer. I need to collect info > from a form and have the info encrypted and e-mailed to me. I would be > willing to try to make it work, but being a novice I figured you all > would probably rather me keep my grubby little hands off your nice clean > code! :-D Anyhow, if anyone knows of a solution or is willing to add > this feature to NMS FormMail, or has any other suggestions, please let > me know. This is unlikely to be something we are going to add to FormMail (unless someone sends us a suitable patch of course) as we are focusing mostly on our TFmail for new developments. The problem we have with encryption is that in terms of the NMS programs it is always going to rely on some external program or library as implementing strong encryption in pure perl is going to be intolerably slow in terms of program runtime and also will require a lot of time from a skilled developer to implement. Now in terms of using some external program we have a problem: we don't know *what* programs are available and, bearing in mind that the majority of the people using NMS programs are using shared hosting where they are unable to install any new programs that need compilation, we can't mandate a particular encryption program to be used. Further even if we were to assume that a particular encryption system (say GnuPG) were available then it would be difficult for most peole to use as it will require access to a shell on the server to create the keys and so forth. Of course this is not to say that we can't help you at all: I would envisage creating a generalised pipeline filter mechanism for the e-mail contents, I.E. a program can be specified that will process further the standard content and that filtered content then supplied as an attachment to the main message, so for instance (if one where to be using GnuPG) one might specify something like: gpg --encrypt --armor -r jn...@ge... - if you were sending an encrypted message to me. and you would end up with an attachement like (this is just the output of 'ls' of course): -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) hQEOA1xBnKILf4CfEAP+ISKDcDk05wXcZ6jvpGijRmNlZIHtN4oekDW6Qssqq+GX jHGWwGyxTKg8gzKnqs/FddwoLsE0u++1JXFbqOMpThVT3csgK/dniMw6HrSWHzSv /drm5K1ZpjHV4+HDpn+6AbIYVIYKVn3pPh8tc1nbIoN/cDmJKQORQGbIsf2c1ucE AN0CKMBccVQ3Pa/EjeWqPSUSB4vI1hi4pfJrWa7K3fuGZws+vruPZA+i/7trHl5k DIaf0SHQXvKJOjfCWPVDlQdnRZBq5t9KV/GMV3s3AylaY2mUVKZAwJIGb9HZC10F wLTbeR5di3wqsSTlVJ4hyvdhuF6NE0W4aCRlExI5+R8L0sBVAYsprmJd9n/qHqX9 j7dqPTZe8PMbZMKv5p8xcz0gkISimJeOfN1hrSqvTZxGwEqC9hy+eHnYB8Fe7p6X jIJGjrP6nwOXx89E76KBfv1lWfWSgazbwHQuklAS0TeVr3M5PUafwfmwLnBBBbuu uz5JB2ekds1nZstxz5m1IBQ/hy54HBgjWq2p7Ut3uC/MgV8PufkeZJ0j721vQaH9 mX04bKGTpdtU1XaIEv/6Zrl5fx1D0WK+J+ggjEJn9tclBNLRZbo+fuxBvn1GSvpa VYgcI7WqeKn66Zmebj5Oaq7nX//va/uWlrKDs/eLt7pfMI1H70fugNZabaevkDHw /Jmifm6Uick5QWyrJaSsds41+Ssao82cfg== =zfch -----END PGP MESSAGE----- I guess that configuration would be also added to specify the content type of the attachment and probably so separate templates could be specified for the main body part and the unfiltered content of the attachment. Of course this all depends on some developer finding some time to actually implement it, and as this is a volunteer effort no-one can make any indication of when or if this will actually be done. Of course you might have a completely different idea of how the encryption might be done, please feel free to supply some more detail. /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Jonathon H. <jon...@co...> - 2005-10-12 01:24:53
|
Hello, I am a novice Perl programmer and web developer. I need to collect info from a form and have the info encrypted and e-mailed to me. I would be willing to try to make it work, but being a novice I figured you all would probably rather me keep my grubby little hands off your nice clean code! :-D Anyhow, if anyone knows of a solution or is willing to add this feature to NMS FormMail, or has any other suggestions, please let me know. Thanks, Jonathon |
From: Scott H. <js...@ve...> - 2005-09-21 14:03:41
|
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 08:48:55PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:09, Scott Hepler wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I don't know if formmail is still being updated (I've read of a preference > > for TFMail updates in the archives of this list), but I'm including a patch > > to pass the form values along to the 'missing_fields_redirect' page in a > > query string. It also sends the contents of @missing_fields. This lets > > the error page re-display the form, or give better feedback. > > Thanks for this! I'll take a look at putting this into the next > release. If you have some spare time, it might be nice to have a > configuration to switch this behaviour on and off as it might confuse > users upgrading. An example of how to use this in Javascript or PHP > might be useful as well :-) Great! I'll of course be glad if it gets in, but please feel free to fix as necessary if you decide to have it. I'm attaching a bigger patch with the other changes you suggested (switch, example). I'm not real thrilled with that huge variable name for the switch, but couldn't really decide between "short" and "exact"..... -s. -- Scott Hepler System Administration and Security Web Development 802.457.3796 |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-09-20 19:48:35
|
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:09, Scott Hepler wrote: > Greetings, > > I don't know if formmail is still being updated (I've read of a preference > for TFMail updates in the archives of this list), but I'm including a patch > to pass the form values along to the 'missing_fields_redirect' page in a > query string. It also sends the contents of @missing_fields. This lets > the error page re-display the form, or give better feedback. Thanks for this! I'll take a look at putting this into the next release. If you have some spare time, it might be nice to have a configuration to switch this behaviour on and off as it might confuse users upgrading. An example of how to use this in Javascript or PHP might be useful as well :-) /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Scott H. <js...@ve...> - 2005-09-20 18:10:10
|
Greetings, I don't know if formmail is still being updated (I've read of a preference for TFMail updates in the archives of this list), but I'm including a patch to pass the form values along to the 'missing_fields_redirect' page in a query string. It also sends the contents of @missing_fields. This lets the error page re-display the form, or give better feedback. FWIW, -s. -- Scott Hepler System Administration and Security Web Development 802.457.3796 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-15 02:38:31
|
Bugs item #1291553, was opened at 2005-09-15 02:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425769&aid=1291553&group_id=39625 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mindy (mindyloo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't locate CGI/NMS/Script/FormMail.pm in @INC Initial Comment: Hello Support, I've been working on upgrading my webserver and its scripts, but for the life of me, I can't get the form mail working again. I can successfully execute the script from the command line - it geneartes the HTML that should be output to my webbrowser. If I comment out the line use lib './lib'; it generates the same error as I see in my web error log. httpd error_log message(s): Can't locate CGI/NMS/Script/FormMail.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ./lib /System/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level /System/Library/Perl/5.8.6 /Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread- multi-2level /Library/Perl/5.8.6 /Library/Perl /Network/Library/Perl/ 5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level /Network/Library/Perl/5.8.6 / Network/Library/Perl /System/Library/Perl/Extras/5.8.6/darwin- thread-multi-2level /System/Library/Perl/Extras/5.8.6 /Library/Perl/ 5.8.1) at /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/FormMail.pl line 99. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /Library/WebServer/CGI- Executables/FormMail.pl line 99. [Wed Sep 14 20:04:56 2005] [error] [client 66.101.23.110] Premature end of script headers: /Library/WebServer/CGI- Executables/FormMail.pl My webserving machine is a powermac:g4 OS is 10.4.2 Perl is /System/Library/Perl/5.8.6 Apache is version 1.3.33 I've tried moving that lib directory & contents all over the server, but it cannot be found by the apache installation. Is there somewhere in apache that I need to define the location for perl modules? Looking forward to your assistance ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425769&aid=1291553&group_id=39625 |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-09-06 20:09:24
|
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 17:42, Scott wrote: > Is there a way to make you nms_formmail compatible with a Windows 2003 > server wherein the email server requires SMTP Authentication? > This has been on the developer TODO list for some time - it requires that the built-in SMTP client be rewritten so that it can do this, one of the major problems is that except for plaintext AUTH LOGIN some fairly hefty encryption code is going to have to be written (bearing in mind that we can't specify any prerequisite external modules or code that requires separate compilation). I have copied this to the developers list to see if anyone has the time to look at some SMTP AUTH stuff in their free time. /J\ -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: GMO <gm...@gb...> - 2005-09-06 14:38:06
|
Actually, for me, the optional link url, title and image are only in the way. Is there a way to also eliminate those fields? Obviously you can leave it out of the main HTML page, but the prog still makes it available in the followups. (Not to mention I have a *heck* of a lot of complaints of not being able to post due to banned words that are *not* on the banned words list. And yes, I've tried posting myself and get errors once in a while) Gary Near the turn of the century, On 6 Sep 2005 at 7:23, Gary Meyer spake thusly: > Please be aware that ALL of the following fields are open to spammers > since words in these fields cannot currently be filtered: > > Email: > Subject: > Optional Link URL: > Link Title: > Optional Image URL: > > > > On Sep 6, 2005, at 4:30 AM, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 06:37, Dave Cross wrote: > > > >> This sounds like a sensible suggestion. Anyone want to try > >> implementing it? > >> > >> > > > > I thought that it did do that, but I'll take a crack at it this week > > some time. I need to implement the SURBL checking in the subject as > > well at some point. > > > > > >> Dave... > >> > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: wwwboard suggestion > >> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:33:49 -0700 > >> From: Gary Meyer <ga...@sp...> > >> To: da...@us... > >> > >> WWWBOARD version 1.60 > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I realize you may not be the right person to contact, but since I > >> don't know who is, I'll drop my suggestion on you. > >> > >> WWWBOARD is awesome and is more useful than any PHP board I've > >> seen. The words filter has allowed me to handle most spam attacks, > >> but there is one weakness that seems so obvious, I can't believe > >> it's been left open. The contents of the SUBJECT field cannot be > >> filtered for words. Many spammers have realized this and are > >> launching attacks through the SUBJECT field in WWWBOARD daily. > >> > >> My suggestion is simply: Give the SUBJECT field the same level of > >> filter capability that other fields have. > >> > >> If I've overlooked something and you believe the SUBJECT field can > >> be filtered, please let me know. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Gary Meyer > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > >> Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & > >> Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement > >> * http://www.sqe.com/ bsce5sf > >> _______________________________________________ Nms-cgi-devel > >> mailing list Nms...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nms-cgi-devel > >> > > -- > > > > This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams > * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe from > this mailing list visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nms-cgi-support and > follow the simple instructions. |
From: Gary M. <ga...@sp...> - 2005-09-06 14:23:51
|
Please be aware that ALL of the following fields are open to spammers since words in these fields cannot currently be filtered: Email: Subject: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: On Sep 6, 2005, at 4:30 AM, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 06:37, Dave Cross wrote: > >> This sounds like a sensible suggestion. Anyone want to try >> implementing it? >> >> > > I thought that it did do that, but I'll take a crack at it this week > some time. I need to implement the SURBL checking in the subject as > well at some point. > > >> Dave... >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: wwwboard suggestion >> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:33:49 -0700 >> From: Gary Meyer <ga...@sp...> >> To: da...@us... >> >> WWWBOARD version 1.60 >> >> Hi, >> >> I realize you may not be the right person to contact, but since I >> don't know who is, I'll drop my suggestion on you. >> >> WWWBOARD is awesome and is more useful than any PHP board I've seen. >> The words filter has allowed me to handle most spam attacks, but >> there is one weakness that seems so obvious, I can't believe it's >> been left open. The contents of the SUBJECT field cannot be filtered >> for words. Many spammers have realized this and are launching >> attacks through the SUBJECT field in WWWBOARD daily. >> >> My suggestion is simply: Give the SUBJECT field the same level of >> filter capability that other fields have. >> >> If I've overlooked something and you believe the SUBJECT field can be >> filtered, please let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> Gary Meyer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle >> Practices >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * >> Testing & QA >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ >> bsce5sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Nms-cgi-devel mailing list >> Nms...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nms-cgi-devel >> > -- > > This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ > > > |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-09-06 11:30:41
|
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 06:37, Dave Cross wrote: > This sounds like a sensible suggestion. Anyone want to try implementing it? > I thought that it did do that, but I'll take a crack at it this week some time. I need to implement the SURBL checking in the subject as well at some point. > Dave... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: wwwboard suggestion > Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:33:49 -0700 > From: Gary Meyer <ga...@sp...> > To: da...@us... > > WWWBOARD version 1.60 > > Hi, > > I realize you may not be the right person to contact, but since I > don't know who is, I'll drop my suggestion on you. > > WWWBOARD is awesome and is more useful than any PHP board I've seen. > The words filter has allowed me to handle most spam attacks, but > there is one weakness that seems so obvious, I can't believe it's > been left open. The contents of the SUBJECT field cannot be filtered > for words. Many spammers have realized this and are launching > attacks through the SUBJECT field in WWWBOARD daily. > > My suggestion is simply: Give the SUBJECT field the same level of > filter capability that other fields have. > > If I've overlooked something and you believe the SUBJECT field can be > filtered, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Gary Meyer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Nms-cgi-devel mailing list > Nms...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nms-cgi-devel -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Dave C. <da...@us...> - 2005-09-02 05:37:37
|
This sounds like a sensible suggestion. Anyone want to try implementing it? Dave... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: wwwboard suggestion Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:33:49 -0700 From: Gary Meyer <ga...@sp...> To: da...@us... WWWBOARD version 1.60 Hi, I realize you may not be the right person to contact, but since I don't know who is, I'll drop my suggestion on you. WWWBOARD is awesome and is more useful than any PHP board I've seen. The words filter has allowed me to handle most spam attacks, but there is one weakness that seems so obvious, I can't believe it's been left open. The contents of the SUBJECT field cannot be filtered for words. Many spammers have realized this and are launching attacks through the SUBJECT field in WWWBOARD daily. My suggestion is simply: Give the SUBJECT field the same level of filter capability that other fields have. If I've overlooked something and you believe the SUBJECT field can be filtered, please let me know. Thanks, Gary Meyer |
From: Dave C. <da...@da...> - 2005-08-01 11:05:15
|
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:04:50PM +0100, ABDOULIE JALLOW wrote: > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, > DEAR SIR, > HOW ARE U, HOPE U ARE FINE AN EVERY ONE OVERTHERE, THE PORPOSE OF THIS > APPLICATION ITS THAT I WAN TO JOING TO YR TEAM , MA NAME IS ABDOULIE > AM FROM GAMBIA, HOPE TO HERE FROM U SOON, Abdoulie, What sort of help do you think you can be to us? What we need most help with is people to answer questions on the support mailing list. For that you need a detailed understanding of how our programs work and the ability to explain that in clear English to people who might not know as much about CGI programs and web server configuration as you do. If you think you can help out there, then please subscribe to the list, watch what happens for a week or two and then leap in with replies when you feel comfortable. Oh, and when you're answering questions on the support list please DON'T SHOUT :) Dave... --=20 This is the definition of my life |
From: ABDOULIE J. <abd...@ya...> - 2005-07-26 16:05:09
|
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, DEAR SIR, HOW ARE U, HOPE U ARE FINE AN EVERY ONE OVERTHERE, THE PORPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION ITS THAT I WAN TO JOING TO YR TEAM , MA NAME IS ABDOULIE AM FROM GAMBIA, HOPE TO HERE FROM U SOON, YRS FAITFULLY, ABDOULIE --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PCcalling worldwide with voicemail |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-07-01 16:28:46
|
Support Requests item #1231073, was opened at 2005-07-01 16:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1231073&group_id=39625 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mike (gpsmike) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: multiple recipients for form mail Initial Comment: I've had a quick look round the archives didn't find the answer. is it possible to configure the formail script to send the submitted information on a form to multiple email addresses? (without including addresses in the HTML of the web page) i couldn't work it out from the info in the readme. appologies if it's there mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1231073&group_id=39625 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-07-01 12:59:44
|
Support Requests item #1230925, was opened at 2005-07-01 12:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1230925&group_id=39625 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mike (gpsmike) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: multiple recipients for form mail Initial Comment: I've had a quick look round the archives didn't find the answer. is it possible to configure the formail script to send the submitted information on a form to multiple email addresses? (without including addresses in the HTML of the web page) i couldn't work it out from the info in the readme. appologies if it's there mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=425770&aid=1230925&group_id=39625 |
From: Bertha B. <ber...@ya...> - 2005-06-03 15:46:55
|
Got benefit? Would you like to get Health Benefit for LESS? NOW YOU COULD!! For as low as $99.99 per month per family. INCLUDES DENTAL, PRESCIPTIONS, VISION,MADICAL, ALTERNATIVE, ACCIDENTS and more!! join today and also get other greate benefit? FOR MOR INFORMATION LOG ON TO WWW.USHAC.COM/BETTYBRISENO or Call 866-736-3141 BUSINESS ONERS! Can't afford a health insurance plan for your employees? Discover the NON-Insurance solution. Our medical discout card will save your employees up to 10% - 60% on Doctors, Hospitals, Dentist, Prescriptions, and more. NOT Isurance. Every one eccepted. log on to www.usahc.com/bettybriseno or call 866-736-3141 --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. |
From: Jonathan S. <jn...@ge...> - 2005-04-15 15:52:53
|
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 15:02, Dave Cross wrote: > Have we missed a release somewhere along the line? > Very probably, the release script upload the files to the SF ftp site but one needs to go in and make the release in the SF files thingy manually. I probably did the release and got distracted before I could jiggle with the SF stuff. I'm not sure I can be bothered to sort it out at this point - it'll be fixed with the next release ;-) > ----- Forwarded message from Nonnac <no...@gm...> ----- > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:24:58 +0100 > From: Nonnac <no...@gm...> > To: da...@us... > Subject: NMS Formmail - versions incorrect? > X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) > > On your NMS formmail program - the latest version on Sourceforge - see: > > <http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=39625&package_id=3193 > 6> > > ... seems to be 3.12c1 - but on your web pages - see: > > <http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/scripts.shtml> > > ... seems to be 3.14c1?? > > Thanks, Andrew. > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- This e-mail is sponsored by http://www.integration-house.com/ |
From: Dave C. <da...@us...> - 2005-04-14 15:02:22
|
Have we missed a release somewhere along the line? ----- Forwarded message from Nonnac <no...@gm...> ----- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:24:58 +0100 From: Nonnac <no...@gm...> To: da...@us... Subject: NMS Formmail - versions incorrect? X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) On your NMS formmail program - the latest version on Sourceforge - see: <http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=39625&package_id=3193 6> ... seems to be 3.12c1 - but on your web pages - see: <http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/scripts.shtml> ... seems to be 3.14c1?? Thanks, Andrew. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- If you miss an opportunity to see him perform... you're a total asshole. David Cross rocks my world. -- Jack Black |