From: Wizard <wi...@ne...> - 2003-02-12 12:57:00
|
> I think it would be perfectly acceptable to require users to specify > both domains. It would be. I just hope to make it better than that. > I still think it is a requirement to block whole sub-domains, for > instance *@*.kr or *@*.spammers-r-us.com I'm not sure that we differ on that, but there could be some problems with it either way: how does the second example treat the example given yesterday of info@dk? or fr...@sp...? Depending on how it parses, we could block neither or both. Is it better to fail conservatively, aggressively, or not at all? These are all things I'm trying to consider (my brain hurts). > It would be a very cool thing but I'm not convinced it is doable or > necessary. Big kudos to you if it works though :) I'm not convinced either, just an optimistic pessimist. That means that my glass is half-full of crap :-). Grant M. |