From: Simon W. <es...@ou...> - 2003-02-11 15:30:14
|
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 15:12, Wizard wrote: > > in...@bl... is valid too. And what is a standard anyway ? > > Standard (U.S.): A car with a manual-shift transmission. That's the great thing about standards, there are so many to choose from. > > Finland has no second level domain structure. e.g. www.genelec.fi is a > > valid domain. > > I never liked the Saab, either. Can't they do anything right ;-). That's OK. Saab isn't Finnish. > > > 2.> Do email addresses ever have port numbers appended, like this: > > > fr...@fs...:24 > > > ? Let me know. > > > > Not that I know of but there are a *lot* of ways of expressing comments > > and so on in email addresses that you may need to take account of. > > The question is 'Do I?', or can I just assume the most typical formats and > ignore the rest (for blocking, anyway)? I can probably account for 99% of > formats, and then do a final string_match for emails in the 'allow_user' > configuration variable. Will this work? Can we turn it up the other way and ask what it is you are trying to accomplish ? > > Do you mean .us domains of G-TLD's like .com and .org ? > > The latter, as anything else should be handled by the international code. whithouse.gov ? nasa.gov ? Simon |