From: Wizard <wi...@ne...> - 2003-02-07 00:28:51
|
> If it's not really XML, it shouldn't have a dtd IMO. Technically speaking, the only reason that we aren't calling it XML is because we're not parsing it as XML. The file itself is valid XML. > If we want to avoid confusion with XML, how about just avoiding > anglebrackets, e.g. use "[foo]bah[/foo]" instead of the XML like > "<foo>bar</foo>". The primary reason I proposed this was in response to Simon's issue of someone munging the file with an XML editor. If someone wants to edit the data file directly, I don't believe the tag format that we use will be either a deterrent or an incentive. It was just a suggestion. I just felt that by providing a DTD, we can control how their XML editor will edit it. Thanks, Grant M. |