|
From: Jonathan S. <gel...@ge...> - 2002-02-21 12:18:07
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Wizard wrote: > > The problem with using a different storage scheme .... > I'm not suggesting that we should change the storage scheme: this would militate against one of our tenets which is to retain compatibility with an existing installation of the equivalent MSA program, rather I am trying to draw peoples attention to the possibility that the current storage mechanism does have an issue wherein a black hat could fill your disk up quite quickly with a succession of follow-ups to their own threads. I don't think I would be bothered to write yet another bulletin board (YABB) if we were going to discard the backward compatibility requirement - I would tend to push people in the direction of FooBBS <http://www.geeksalad.org/FooBBS/> by Clinton Pierce - of course this does have some external module requirements ... Not that I would like to discourage anyone from creating a new storage mechanism that could be used on green field sites (bearing in mind this can't use any non-Core modules so XML or DBI is out :() /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | <http://www.gellyfish.com> | This space for rent | |