|
From: Jonathan S. <gel...@ge...> - 2002-01-26 18:52:03
|
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: > > > One thing that you'll learn is that we HAVE TO be backwards compatible with > > MWS. Unfortunately, that includes keeping similarly named configuration > > variable names. Its sad, and may seem stupid at times, but breaking this > > rule defeats the whole purpose for nms in the first place. > > I don't quite understand why one has to be backwards compatible in > variable names, but if these are the rules, it's ok. > I'm not absolutely sure why either - I thought that the compatibility thing was only with respect to the inputs and outputs but ho-hum :) /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | <http://www.gellyfish.com> | This space for rent | |