|
From: Nick C. <ni...@cl...> - 2002-01-20 14:54:08
|
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:13:45PM +1100, iain truskett wrote: > > Yes, but the SPAM potential is limited (attacker can't control message > > contents) and the feature is off by default, so I don't see a problem > > with adding it. > > Cool then. Possibly mention potential caveats in the comments/README? Good idea, done. I put it in the comments to make it hard for someone to turn the feature on without reading the warning. -- Nick |