relax SVN archive

Modified the spin_loop to check the tuple of (mol, res, spin) against the selection object.

Initialized merge tracking via "svnmerge" with revisions "1-5710" from
svn+ssh://bugman@.../svn/relax/1.3

Ok, lets try this again! Created a branch for some nasty breakages and testing new ideas.

The command used was:
svn cp svn+ssh://bugman@.../svn/relax/1.3 svn+ssh://bugman@.../svn/relax/branches/spin_loop_bool

The spin_loop and its siblings cannot currently handle the branching tree formed by the Selection
object (nested within Selection._union and Selection._intersect). For example if there are two
molecules loaded into the data store, 'Ap4Aase' and 'RNA', the spin_loop with the spin id string
'#Ap4Aase:Glu | #RNA@...' loops over all spins of both molecules!!! Therefore all the usages of the
Selection object need to be redesigned, and possibly the Selection object itself.

Because of the svnmerge-integrated property in 1.3, this branch needs to be recreated.

Otherwise svnmerge.py will not work.

Removed the svnmerged-integrated property. Don't know how this got here.

Created a branch for some nasty breakages and testing new ideas.

The command used was:
svn cp svn+ssh://bugman@.../svn/relax/1.3 svn+ssh://bugman@.../svn/relax/branches/spin_loop_bool

The spin_loop and its siblings cannot currently handle the branching tree formed by the Selection
object (nested within Selection._union and Selection._intersect). For example if there are two
molecules loaded into the data store, 'Ap4Aase' and 'RNA', the spin_loop with the spin id string
'#Ap4Aase:Glu | #RNA@...' loops over all spins of both molecules!!! Therefore all the usages of the
Selection object need to be redesigned, and possibly the Selection object itself.

Wrote the unit test test_spin_loop_boolean_or().

Wrote the test_spin_loop_single_spin() unit test.

Converted test_boolean_or_selection() to test_Selection_boolean_or().

The Selection object is being fully probed.

A few changes to the test_boolean_complex_selection() unit test.