This shows, that the boot strapping method get the SAME estimation for R2eff errors, as the estimate_r2eff_err() function!
This must either mean, that the OLD Monte-Carlo simulation was corrupted, or the creation of data in Monte-Carlo simulations is corrupted.
For the r2eff columns.
0.0348/0.0692/0.0348/0.0691
Old MC 2000/Estimated from Co-var/Manual re-calc of old MC/ Boot strapping 2000 simulations.
-------------
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 431.0.
r2eff=8.646/8.646 r2eff_err=0.0348/0.0692/0.0348/0.0691 i0=202664.191/202664.191 i0_err=699.6443/712.4201/699.6443/693.1613
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 651.2.
r2eff=10.377/10.377 r2eff_err=0.0403/0.0810/0.0403/0.0823 i0=206049.558/206049.558 i0_err=776.4215/782.1833/776.4215/763.6342
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 800.5.
r2eff=10.506/10.506 r2eff_err=0.0440/0.0853/0.0440/0.0887 i0=202586.332/202586.332 i0_err=763.9678/758.7052/763.9678/776.2788
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 984.0.
r2eff=10.903/10.903 r2eff_err=0.0476/0.0922/0.0476/0.0968 i0=203455.021/203455.021 i0_err=837.8779/828.7280/837.8779/834.3398
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=10.684/10.684 r2eff_err=0.0446/0.0853/0.0446/0.0889 i0=218670.412/218670.412 i0_err=850.0210/830.9558/850.0210/825.7990
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=118.078 ppm and dispersion point 1648.5.
r2eff=10.501/10.501 r2eff_err=0.0371/0.0742/0.0371/0.0754 i0=206502.512/206502.512 i0_err=794.0523/772.9843/794.0523/776.3687
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=124.247 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=11.118/11.118 r2eff_err=0.0413/0.0827/0.0413/0.0870 i0=216447.241/216447.241 i0_err=784.6562/788.0384/784.6562/810.1911
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=130.416 ppm and dispersion point 800.5.
r2eff=7.866/7.866 r2eff_err=0.0347/0.0695/0.0347/0.0712 i0=211869.715/211869.715 i0_err=749.2776/763.6930/749.2776/747.9741
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=130.416 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=9.259/9.259 r2eff_err=0.0331/0.0661/0.0331/0.0680 i0=217703.151/217703.151 i0_err=682.2137/685.5838/682.2137/700.1831
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=130.416 ppm and dispersion point 1648.5.
r2eff=9.565/9.565 r2eff_err=0.0373/0.0745/0.0373/0.0743 i0=211988.939/211988.939 i0_err=839.0313/827.0373/839.0313/815.4495
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=142.754 ppm and dispersion point 800.5.
r2eff=3.240/3.240 r2eff_err=0.0127/0.0253/0.0127/0.0254 i0=214417.382/214417.382 i0_err=595.8865/613.4378/595.8865/606.4650
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=142.754 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=5.084/5.084 r2eff_err=0.0177/0.0352/0.0177/0.0353 i0=226358.691/226358.691 i0_err=660.5314/655.7670/660.5314/666.9979
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=179.768 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=2.208/2.208 r2eff_err=0.0091/0.0178/0.0091/0.0176 i0=228620.553/228620.553 i0_err=564.8353/560.0873/564.8353/558.6988
R1rho at 799.8 MHz, for offset=241.459 ppm and dispersion point 1341.1.
r2eff=1.711/1.711 r2eff_err=0.0077/0.0155/0.0077/0.0158 i0=224087.486/224087.486 i0_err=539.4300/546.4217/539.4300/556.5093
task #7822(https://gna.org/task/index.php?7822): Implement user function to estimate R2eff and associated errors for exponential curve fitting.
