Menu
▾
▴
nmock-two-dev
|
From: Richard H. <aci...@ac...> - 2008-04-21 16:03:59
|
There is an enhancement request for more matchers for the generic list. The request linked to an email thread that I don¹t seem to be able to get to anymore so if anyone who has written custom list matchers or has changed their testing because they didn¹t have a list matcher let me know what is needed I will be able to work on getting them into the main release. -Richard Holden |
|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2009-02-18 20:52:33
|
Hi Everybody who is listening to this mailing list: Almost a year ago you posted your last release on NMock project. On the other side we mad a lot of progress thanks to two very active developers. Today we could present the first release candidate of mocking classes. So we have the code, you have the downloads (12000 against 1900 in 2008): Wouldn't it make sense to consolidate and stop working on NMock and stop confusing users? Please let me know if you are willing to close down NMock and participate NMock2... I'm happy to hear from you. Thomas |
|
From: Steve M. <Ste...@ty...> - 2009-02-18 23:40:11
|
I've been unable to actively work the project due to my work getting in the way and not allocating a lot of funds for the open source. I asked you at the time you posted where you were going with NMock so that we could try and coordinate the two efforts. My big concern is with how far you've taken the syntax away from NMock2's style. Granted, for .NET 3.5 there is a need to move away from the existing style, however, I wouldn't want users of the project to think that they are getting an upgrade to what they have, only to discover that it is actually quite different. So if you start consolidating, it would be nice to have a migration guide ready as well as your code drop. I'm going to continue to not be able to work this, so I'll defer to some of the older project owners on whether they have opinions on this. ________________________________________ From: Thomas Weingartner [tho...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:52 PM To: NMock2 Development Discussion Subject: [NMock2-Dev] Consolidation of NMock and NMock2 Hi Everybody who is listening to this mailing list: Almost a year ago you posted your last release on NMock project. On the other side we mad a lot of progress thanks to two very active developers. Today we could present the first release candidate of mocking classes. So we have the code, you have the downloads (12000 against 1900 in 2008): Wouldn't it make sense to consolidate and stop working on NMock and stop confusing users? Please let me know if you are willing to close down NMock and participate NMock2... I'm happy to hear from you. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ NMock-two-dev mailing list NMo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev |
|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2009-02-21 08:52:18
|
Hi Steve
Thanks for your reply.
I do not understand "...how far you've taken the syntax away from
NMock2's style.". One of our goals was to have full backward
compatibility to the original NMock2 project. To prove this, I opened an
older project that we started 3 years ago with NMock2 version 1.0. The
project compiled immediatly **without any** modification. 15 of the 242
tests failed because of the new mock generation and some missing return
values.
I think we did a great job in backward compatibility and we had a lot of
discussions about it. I always fought for the full compatibility! And
the current release candidate published on the sourceforge site provides
the ability to mock classes too!
You can compare your "old" syntax
http://nmock.org/cheatsheet.html
with the new one here:
http://nmock2.sourceforge.net/doc/NMock2-Cheat-Sheet.pdf
As I always said, our goal is to **continue your great work** and we are
still confident about the simple NMock2 syntax. My concern is that users
are confused when they browse to the nmock project site. Just forward
them to the nmock2 project site.
Cheers
Thomas
On 18.02.2009 22:51, Steve Mitcham wrote:
> ...
> My big concern is with how far you've taken the syntax away from NMock2's style. Granted, for .NET 3.5 there is a need to move away from the existing style, however, I wouldn't want users of the project to think that they are getting an upgrade to what they have, only to discover that it is actually quite different. So if you start consolidating, it would be nice to have a migration guide ready as well as your code drop.
> ...
>
|
|
From: Nat P. <nat...@gm...> - 2009-04-02 21:14:24
|
I'd be happy to see you continue development of NMock-2. --Nat 2009/2/18 Thomas Weingartner <tho...@gm...>: > Hi Everybody who is listening to this mailing list: > > Almost a year ago you posted your last release on NMock project. On the > other side we mad a lot of progress thanks to two very active > developers. Today we could present the first release candidate of > mocking classes. > > So we have the code, you have the downloads (12000 against 1900 in > 2008): Wouldn't it make sense to consolidate and stop working on NMock > and stop confusing users? > > Please let me know if you are willing to close down NMock and > participate NMock2... > > I'm happy to hear from you. > Thomas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > NMock-two-dev mailing list > NMo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev > -- http://www.natpryce.com |
