|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2008-01-14 19:41:29
|
Yes it is true that I'm going to continue NMock2. I had some EMails with Nick Hines from the NMock2 project and I didn't realize that the NMock project is using NMock2 as a moniker. There was no commit activity on the CVS of NMock for the last 7 month. Even worse is that there was no update of the documentation and the web site. On NMock.org is still a release candidate available; no releases. So we thought the project is dead. We used NMock2 in our last project and we will use it on more projects. The main goals we have are - Maintaining documentation, releases and the forums - Document and cleaning the code - Incorporating of new ideas (e.g. get rid of strings, mocking classes etc.) We really want to continue NMock2 code and really want to combine efforts on NMock and NMock2. Just to make our standpoint clear: The company where I work will support the NMock2 project. I'm the project leader and I have two developers that will help me maintaining everything. We will get some official daily time to develop for NMock2. On the other hand the company want to see something like "supported by xyz" with their logo and a link to the web site. Kind Regards Thomas |
|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2008-01-14 20:13:35
|
Hooray. As a first cut, can I suggest you take a look at what we've been doing with jMock? Not all of it will be relevant but we have learned some lessons. My feeling is that "supported by" is fine -- as long as it actually is. A certain Agile consultancy has been a bit feeble in keeping the project alive. S. On 14 Jan 2008, at 19:41, Thomas Weingartner wrote: > Yes it is true that I'm going to continue NMock2. > > I had some EMails with Nick Hines from the NMock2 project and I didn't > realize that the NMock project is using NMock2 as a moniker. There was > no commit activity on the CVS of NMock for the last 7 month. Even > worse > is that there was no update of the documentation and the web site. On > NMock.org is still a release candidate available; no releases. So we > thought the project is dead. > > We used NMock2 in our last project and we will use it on more > projects. > > The main goals we have are > - Maintaining documentation, releases and the forums > - Document and cleaning the code > - Incorporating of new ideas (e.g. get rid of strings, mocking classes > etc.) > > > We really want to continue NMock2 code and really want to combine > efforts on NMock and NMock2. > > Just to make our standpoint clear: The company where I work will > support > the NMock2 project. I'm the project leader and I have two developers > that will help me maintaining everything. We will get some official > daily time to develop for NMock2. On the other hand the company > want to > see something like "supported by xyz" with their logo and a link to > the > web site. > > Kind Regards > Thomas Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 http://www.m3p.co.uk M3P Limited. Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 03689627 |
|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2008-01-19 12:49:29
|
Hi Steve I will take the look to jMock on my TODO list. Thanx Thomas > Hooray. > > As a first cut, can I suggest you take a look at what we've been > doing with jMock? Not all of it will be relevant but we have learned > some lessons. > > My feeling is that "supported by" is fine -- as long as it actually > is. A certain Agile consultancy has been a bit feeble in keeping the > project alive. > > S. > > On 14 Jan 2008, at 19:41, Thomas Weingartner wrote: > > >> Yes it is true that I'm going to continue NMock2. >> >> I had some EMails with Nick Hines from the NMock2 project and I didn't >> realize that the NMock project is using NMock2 as a moniker. There was >> no commit activity on the CVS of NMock for the last 7 month. Even >> worse >> is that there was no update of the documentation and the web site. On >> NMock.org is still a release candidate available; no releases. So we >> thought the project is dead. >> >> We used NMock2 in our last project and we will use it on more >> projects. >> >> The main goals we have are >> - Maintaining documentation, releases and the forums >> - Document and cleaning the code >> - Incorporating of new ideas (e.g. get rid of strings, mocking classes >> etc.) >> >> >> We really want to continue NMock2 code and really want to combine >> efforts on NMock and NMock2. >> >> Just to make our standpoint clear: The company where I work will >> support >> the NMock2 project. I'm the project leader and I have two developers >> that will help me maintaining everything. We will get some official >> daily time to develop for NMock2. On the other hand the company >> want to >> see something like "supported by xyz" with their logo and a link to >> the >> web site. >> >> Kind Regards >> Thomas >> > > > Steve Freeman > Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 > > http://www.m3p.co.uk > > M3P Limited. > Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. > Company registered in England & Wales. Number 03689627 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > NMock-two-dev mailing list > NMo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev > > |
