Re: [Nmock-general] Couple questions and suggestions

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

It's true that things have been very quiet for a while. At present, Nat=20=

is cooking up a very nice-looking rewrite based on our experiences with=20=

jMock (www.jmock.org). I don't have a .Net box at the moment, anyone=20
else want to volunteer to pick this one up?

S.

On 9 May 2005, at 15:41, John Price wrote:
> I just joined the list after I got an email response from Joe Walnes=20=

> telling me he=92s no longer involved in the NMock project.=A0 So the =
first=20
> thing I wanted to suggest is an update to the nmock.org website with=20=

> some more up-to-date contact info.=A0 My apologies if any of this has=20=

> been recently addressed, but a quick look through the archives didn=92t=20=

> reveal anything.
> =A0
> More generally, it=92s not really clear where the =93official=94 =
source for=20
> information on NMock is.=A0 Clicking on the =93Tracker=94 link on =
NMock.org=20
> takes you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are=20=

> tracked on SourceForge.=A0 In general, the only reference the =
NMock.org=20
> page makes to SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries.
> =A0
> Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran=20
> into bug =93NMO-44=94 as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker (=93Using=20
> DynamicMock with inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException=94)=
=20
> and think that I=92ve got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for=20=

> it).=A0 How can I go about submitting my change back to the project =
for=20
> review?
> =A0