|
From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2005-05-10 22:21:17
|
It's true that things have been very quiet for a while. At present, Nat=20= is cooking up a very nice-looking rewrite based on our experiences with=20= jMock (www.jmock.org). I don't have a .Net box at the moment, anyone=20 else want to volunteer to pick this one up? S. On 9 May 2005, at 15:41, John Price wrote: > I just joined the list after I got an email response from Joe Walnes=20= > telling me he=92s no longer involved in the NMock project.=A0 So the = first=20 > thing I wanted to suggest is an update to the nmock.org website with=20= > some more up-to-date contact info.=A0 My apologies if any of this has=20= > been recently addressed, but a quick look through the archives didn=92t=20= > reveal anything. > =A0 > More generally, it=92s not really clear where the =93official=94 = source for=20 > information on NMock is.=A0 Clicking on the =93Tracker=94 link on = NMock.org=20 > takes you to one bug tracking system, while another set of issues are=20= > tracked on SourceForge.=A0 In general, the only reference the = NMock.org=20 > page makes to SourceForge is for downloading source or binaries. > =A0 > Anyway, the reason I emailed Joe in the first place was that I ran=20 > into bug =93NMO-44=94 as tracked by the JIRA bug tracker (=93Using=20 > DynamicMock with inheriting interfaces throws NullReferenceException=94)= =20 > and think that I=92ve got a fix for it (and a unit test to check for=20= > it).=A0 How can I go about submitting my change back to the project = for=20 > review? > =A0 |