Re: [Nmock-general] asynchronous testing

[<thi...@gm...>]

Hi

I'm also interested in feedback on multithreaded testing from NMock users/d=
evs.

I sometimes do a manual wait with a timeout, but maybe there's a
better way already ?


regards

Thibaut Barr=E8re
http://www.dotnetguru2.org/tbarrere

2005/4/18, Dean Hiller <dea...@bo...>:
> =20
> =20
> =20
>=20
> Is there a way to use NMock to test subsystems that have different thread=
s.=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> Ie. I want to do something like this=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> mockListener.setTimeout(10000);=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> SysUnderTest.addClientListener(mockListener);=20
>=20
> SysUnderTest.invokeToStart();=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> CalledMethod m =3D mockListener.expectMethodCall("someMethodOnListener");=
=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> Where expectMethodCall actually does a Monitor.Wait(timeout) because the
> method "someMethodOnListener" is=20
>=20
> Invoked on a different thread and not invoked on the
> SysUnderTest.invokeToStart() client thread(ie. The test thread)=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> Is there a way to do this?  Java's mocklib does this very nicely for this
> type of testing.=20
>=20
>  =20
>=20
> Thanks,=20
>=20
> dean=20
>=20
>  ________________________________
>  The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments hereto are =
for
> the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain confidential, privileg=
ed
> and nondisclosable information. If the recipient of this e-mail is not th=
e
> addressee, or a person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the
> addressee, such recipient is strictly prohibited from reading, printing,
> photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this e-mail or any attachme=
nts
> hereto in any way. If the recipient has received this e-mail in error,
> please send return e-mail immediately notifying us of your receipt of thi=
s
> e-mail and delete the e-mail from your inbox. Thank you.