[Nmock-general] MethodSignature and friends

[Jim A. <JA...@th...>]

<FONT face=3D"Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size=
=3D2><div>The method resolution in NMock is really starting to annoy me :-)=
&nbsp; It works for simple cases (find a method named "Foo" with a return t=
ype of "Bar"), but complex scenarios with overloads&nbsp; and indexed prope=
rties are still buggy.&nbsp; The fundamental problem is that the user is no=
t forced to specify the attributes necessary to find a method.&nbsp; SetupR=
esult() can just take a method name and a return value, which is really not=
 enough to resolve overloaded properties.</div><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We sho=
uld just get rid of the whole MethodSignature thing and start using real Me=
thodInfos and PropertyInfos instead.&nbsp; It&nbsp;might make the public AP=
I slightly more complex, but would close a whole class of bugs.</DIV><DIV>&=
nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Can I get a +/- 1 from anybody?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>=
Jim</DIV></FONT>=