Re: [Nmock-general] RE: NMock

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Could you stub methods A..E, rather than setting expectations on them?

S

Paul Brousseau wrote:
> It's not so much a problem as a possible inconvinience at times.  I
> think my sample below didn't properly set up the situation.  Let's
> say that I have method X that I want to test, but to get to the right
> state, I have to call methods A, B, C, D, and E, each of which result
> in calls to the Mock object.  It would be easier for me to not have
> to worry about counting the various method calls in that setup stage.
> If I could wipe out my expectations, then I would only have to check
> the stuff that goes along with method X.  So there's nothing wrong
> with calling Verify multiple times, but I'd like not to have to think
> about verifying the results of methods A-E (say, because I've already
> verified that they work elsewhere).
>