Re: [Nmock-general] Commentable Verify Call

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

An interesting idea, but could you do more to make the current case more 
readable, like having a more explanatory test name:
   SetsCategoryInViewFromCategoryProviderForGivenName

Also, you can set the name of the Mock if the class isn't explanatory 
enough.

S.

Nick Robinson wrote:
> I am wondering what peoples thoughts are on commentable Verify calls to the
> mock object? It seems I sometimes feel a little more information would be
> extremely beneficial, especially if more than one mock object is involved in
> a set of object messages:
> 
> 		[Test]
> 		public void SelectCategory()
> 		{
> 			_view.Expect("SetCategories", _computers.SubCategories);
> 			_categoryProviderMock.ExpectAndReturn("Find", _computers.SubCategories,
> "Computers");
> 			_controller.SelectCategory("Computers");
> 
> 			_view.Verify("The controller has not called back into the view");
> 			_categoryProviderMock.Verify();
> 		}
> 
> In this instance, albeit simple, the message goes a long way in explaining
> the failure better to the reader (at least I think so).