RE: [Nmock-general] Mocking types with constructors

[Mike B. <mbr...@vi...>]

I'm still confused.

Does the current Nmock allow classes to be mocked?

Wouldn't a mock of a class have a mock as a base as well?  Are you saying
that the mocked class would have the real class as its base?

Mike

P.S. A cc'ed list under the assumption that you forgot to.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Arnold [mailto:JA...@th...]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:11 AM
> To: mbr...@vi...
> Subject: RE: [Nmock-general] Mocking types with constructors
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The point is that sometimes the class you're mocking has
> non-virtual methods which the class under test needs to call
> (or perhaps you've used Ignore on some methods), and if you
> don't have a fully constructed base those methods can fail.
> It may not be a big deal, but I've run into it before and
> thought it was worth discussing.
>
> Jim