Re: [Nmock-general] remotable mocks

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

I'm also concerned. One of the reasons we started mocks in the first 
place was to get away from testing against servers -- just too many 
failure modes. Would this be better as an extension to a core library?

S.

Joe Walnes wrote:
 > Looks cool, but I think I'm missing something. Can you give me a
 > scenario of when it would be preferable to host a mock in a remote 
server?