Re: [Nmock-general] Proposal for a change.

[Joe W. <jo...@tr...>]

Looks good - go for it!

Steve Freeman wrote:

> How about ExtractActualValue() ?
>
> S.
>
> Joe Walnes wrote:
>
>> Ok, I get it. Looks good. Can we think of a less confusing name than 
>> TestValue?
>>
>> -j
>>
>> Steve Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> Joe Walnes wrote:
>>>
>>>> st...@m3... wrote:
>>>> I'm not getting the TestValue option. Could you provide an example...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> public void Verify(IConstraint constraint, Object actual)
>>> {
>>>    Assert("Constraint, expected: " + constraint.Message
>>>            + " actual: " + constraint.TestValue(actual),
>>>            constraint.Eval(actual));
>>> }
>>>
>>> public class Equals implements IConstraint {
>>>   public bool Eval(object actual) {
>>>     return expected.Equals(TestValue(actual));
>>>   }
>>>   public virutal object TestValue(object actual) {
>>>     // default implementation
>>>     return actual;
>>>   }
>>>   // ...
>>> }
>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Nmock-general mailing list
> Nmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-general