Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock Cleanup

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Can I also suggest you take a look at jMock2? The new syntax allows  
refactoring, a la Rhino, but is better IMHO.

S

On 8 Nov 2007, at 20:39, aci...@ac... wrote:
> I've been thinking about what we need to do to make NMock2 really look
> alive again, and while the new RC that should be coming soon will  
> be a big
> boost we need to cleanup SourceForge and the website so that we aren't
> showing outdated information.
>
> Proposals:
>
> Close all bugs/Support requests that are not related to NMock2.
> Import the current nmock2 directory from CVS into Subversion to get  
> away
> from NMock 1.0 legacy code.
> Update the SourceForge developer list to reflect current developers
> Decide who should have commit access to the code.
>
> There are more ideas floating around in my head and when I can  
> articulate
> them I'll send them on. Discussion on these ideas is welcome and
> encouraged.
>
> -Richard Holden
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a  
> browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> NMo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>

Steve Freeman
Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006

http://www.m3p.co.uk

M3P Limited.
Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ.
Company registered in England & Wales. Number 03689627