Re: [NMock2-Dev] CVS SVN and .NET 3.5

[Andrey S. <as...@gm...>]

On 10/12/07, aci...@ac... <aci...@ac...> wrote:
> On Fri, October 12, 2007 12:56 pm, Andrey Shchekin wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, aci...@ac... <aci...@ac...> wrote:
> >> On Fri, October 12, 2007 8:55 am, Steve Mitcham wrote:
> >> Bug #: 1740285
> >> Title: NMock don't work with interfaces with visiblity internal
> >> NMock2?: Yes
> >> Proposed Resolution: Need more validation, though I don't believe this
> >> is
> >> something that should be fixed, as it would bypass the CLR's
> >> accessibility
> >> protections, and possibly the original developers intentions.
> >
> > Internal interfaces are definitely mockable in .Net 2.0:
> > http://blog.ashmind.com/index.php/2007/07/07/mocking-internal-interfaces-with-nmock2/
>
> So it is possible, which is nice to know. Your blog post however
> reinforces my statement that we shouldn't fix the "bug". As a developer
> you know you are going to be mocking your code and can add the
> InternalsVisibleTo attribute if you want to. This doesn't work with
> someone elses code but it doesn't make sense to try and rely on behavior
> that an outside library has explicitly marked internal.

Personally I am absolutely fine with the current behavior.
But it needs to be described in Q&A somewhere, with a code snippet.