Re: [NMock2-Dev] Feature Request: "Stub" should have alower prioritythen "Expect"

[Mike C. <mik...@gm...>]

I may be missing something, but I don't quite see why this is a big
deal. In your situation I'd do essentially the same thing Mike Mason
suggested - assign the mock in SetUp , do your Stubbing in a helper
method called at the start of each test that needs it, and Expect as
needed _before_ calling that helper.

If it's really only a tiny minority of tests that need the special
behavior and you don't like the helper calls in every test, call the
helper from SetUp and reassign the mock before customizing it.

- Mike

On 12/09/2007, rdr...@ar... <rdr...@ar...> wrote:
>
> I would have to do a lot more "Copy&Paste" inheritance if i am unable to override a speccific setup. For a simple view with 5 Events i would have to create 5 different setup functions, which would all differe in one line. And there is no way to refactor this out.