Re: [NMock2-Dev] Mock Object Factory

[Mike C. <mik...@gm...>]

On 16/08/07, Steve Mitcham <Ste...@ty...> wrote:
>
> I've made the changes to the mock object factory code that makes the
> generated type collection static to prevent run-away memory usage with the
> mock objects, I'd like to get these changes into the build if no one
> objects.  We can investigate a solution with a more robust proxy generator
> like Castle.DynamicProxy later.

Do you have a rough performance comparison of old vs new
implementations for a reasonable-sized test corpus? That's my only
real concern.

> Finally,  It would be nice if everyone interested in helping in reviving the
> development and getting a release out ping the list so we can start the
> planning process.

*ping*

Also, we badly need to decide how much longer we're going to stay
standardized on VS2003 solution/project files. I do still have access
to VS2003, but that's not going to last forever, and having to make
changes in there and patch them across to my main environment for
testing is a) fragile and b) annoying.