Re: [NMock2-Dev] Fwd: [TDD] Nmock verify

[M. S. F. <va...@sc...>]

Yeah. As I said in my blog, I think that this is a problem with the .Net 
framework, and not with NMock. Have you tried to see if you can 
reproduce the problem with Mono?

Steve Mitcham wrote:
> I copied your test case from your blog into the acceptance tests on my
> version and the casting problem is still exhibited.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nmo...@li...
> [mailto:nmo...@li...] On Behalf Of M.
> Scott Ford
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:11 AM
> To: NMock2 Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [NMock2-Dev] Fwd: [TDD] Nmock verify
>
> I wrote a few blog[1] posts[2] about this a long time ago. I am not sure
>
> if they are still relevant, but they may help.
>
> [1]: http://vaderpi.scottandlaurie.com/blog/?p=184
> [2]: http://vaderpi.scottandlaurie.com/blog/?p=188
>
> Mike Capp wrote:
>   
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I found your old mails on this subject while poking through the nmock
>> list archives regarding a similar issue - an InvalidCastException on
>>
>>             ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
>>             list.Add(mockery.NewMock(typeof(IFoo)));
>>             IFoo[] array = (IFoo[]) list.ToArray(typeof(IFoo));
>>
>> which I suspect has the same root cause as your IServiceContainer
>> woes. Unfortunately, SourceForge's web archives don't include patches
>> attached to mails (I only joined the project recently and so don't
>> have the originals) and I didn't have your email until it popped up in
>> this thread. Do you by any chance still have them handy? I'm not a
>> project admin and so can't give you commit access, but I should be
>> able to apply your fixes and check them in.
>>
>> cheers
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 04/05/07, Steve Mitcham <Ste...@ty...> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I've submitted a patch to a major issue that I've come up against,
>>>       
> that
>   
>>> I believe covers an open error in the bug list, several times only to
>>> have the patch submission be completely ignored. I gave up sending
>>> information to the lists a long time ago due to this behavior.  I can
>>> understand a patch being rejected, but I got no feedback whatsoever
>>>       
> to
>   
>>> my attempts.  This occurred over the course of several months about a
>>> year ago.  The issue still exists.  I don't have time to look up the
>>> exact defect I'm talking about, however, the symptom of the problem
>>>       
> I'm
>   
>>> experiencing boils down to the following test:
>>>
>>>         [Test]
>>>         public void MockObjectsCanBeContainedInServiceContainer()
>>>         {
>>>                 Mockery mockery = new Mockery();
>>>                 ServiceContainer container = new ServiceContainer();
>>>                 IMockedType mockedType = mockery.NewMock(typeof
>>> (IMockedType)) as IMockedType;
>>>
>>>                 container.AddService(typeof
>>>       
> (IMockedType),mockedType);
>   
>>> Assert.AreSame(mockedType,container.GetService(typeof(IMockedType)));
>>>         }
>>>
>>> I have a patch that my company uses that fixes this issue and also
>>> allows for the following functionality:
>>>
>>>                 [Test]
>>>                 public void EventsCanBeRaisedDuringTests()
>>>                 {
>>>                         m_listenerMessage = null;
>>>                         Mockery mocks = new Mockery();
>>>                         Announcer announcer = (Announcer)
>>> mocks.NewMock(typeof(Announcer));
>>>
>>>
>>>       
> Expect.Once.On(announcer).EventAdd("Listeners",
>   
>>> new Listener(DummyListener));
>>>
>>>                         announcer.Listeners += new
>>> Listener(DummyListener);
>>>
>>>
>>>       
> Fire.Event("Listeners").On(announcer).With("Test
>   
>>> Message");
>>>
>>>                         Assert.AreEqual("Test
>>> Message",m_listenerMessage);
>>>                 }
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally,  I have a patch to an issue raise several months ago
>>>       
> concerning
>   
>>> Verification of expectations when ordered expectations are used, also
>>>       
> a
>   
>>> major problem that remains unpatched to date as far as I can tell.
>>>     
>>>       
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>   
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> NMock-two-dev mailing list
>> NMo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> NMo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> NMo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>