Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 status

[Charlie P. <ch...@po...>]

Hi Mike,
 
> Actually Nat, we completely rewrote the website, added a bunch of
documentation, found a Cruise instance to run the build and make us zip
files, and attempted to fix some of the confusion around exactly what "NMock
2" really is (there's an NMock2 project on SourceForge which is confusing
the hell out of people). 

Count me as one of those confused folks... I thought that the sf project was
the "real" NMock 2...
 
Charlie


  _____  

From: nmo...@li...
[mailto:nmo...@li...] On Behalf Of Mike Mason
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:30 PM
To: NMock2 Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 status


On 11/16/06, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: 


The situation from my end is that I don't use .NET and don't intend to
in the foreseeable future.  Some ThoughtWorks people picked up
development and sponsored a release but that went nowhere beyond
putting "Release sponsored by ThoughtWorks" on the website. 



Yes, we haven't totally finished and there's a bunch of things we need to do
to get to a 1.0 release, but it's considerably closer to being a releaseable
piece of software than it was before.



If anyone else is interested in taking over the project, please step
forward.



The beauty of open-source is that people can step up, so if there are
volunteers I'll try to give what limited support I can. 

Cheers,
Mike.