Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 status

[Steve M. <Ste...@ty...>]

I don't know if I'm the only one to have submitted patches to the list,
only to have them be completely ignored.  I can understand getting a
patch rejected, but an explanation for why the patch wasn't accepted
would be useful.

I use NMock2 extensively in my organization and essentially, I'm forced
to maintain my own version to handle the problems with adding NMock2
mocks to a ServiceContainer implementation.

After 2 attempts at submitting the patch for the fix, and several
message to the list asking for status, I basically gave up.

-----Original Message-----
From: nmo...@li...
[mailto:nmo...@li...] On Behalf Of
Charlie Poole
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:59 AM
To: 'NMock2 Development Discussion'
Subject: Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 status

Hi Nat,

So does that imply I should stop waiting for a "stable" NMock2 to
package
with NUnit?

Would it make more sense to just build it from source, do you think?

Charlie=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nmo...@li...=20
> [mailto:nmo...@li...] On=20
> Behalf Of Nat Pryce
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:44 AM
> To: NMock2 Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 status
>=20
> I don't know what's happened to the ThoughtWorks project to=20
> package a convenient NMock 2 release.  I assume it's petered out.
>=20
> However, in your case I don't think it matters.  NMock 2 is=20
> *designed* to be extensible.  You are meant to write your own=20
> matchers to meet your own testing requirements and those=20
> matchers can be seamlessly integrated into NMock 2's "domain=20
> specific language" API so that your tests remain easy to read.
>=20
> --Nat
>=20
> On 15/11/06, Richard Holden <Ric...@qu...> wrote:
> > Is NMock2 dead? We have just started a TDD project here at=20
> work and I=20
> > recommended NMock2 because it did most of what I thought we=20
> needed. I=20
> > am now running into scenarios where the current set of matchers is=20
> > inadequate, including cases where I have seen patches in=20
> the mailing=20
> > lists. I am trying to determine whether to continue using=20
> NMock2 or to=20
> > recommend switching to another .Net mock object framework. I am=20
> > willing to contribute patches and time to NMock2 if it is=20
> going to continue.
> >
> > -Richard Holden
> >
> >=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join=20
> > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share=20
> > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys=20
> - and earn=20
> > cash=20
> >=20
> =
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEV
> > DEV _______________________________________________
> > NMock-two-dev mailing list
> > NMo...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
> >
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join=20
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to=20
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief=20
> surveys - and earn cash=20
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge
> &CID=3DDEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> NMo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>=20



------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
NMock-two-dev mailing list
NMo...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev