|
From: Jim A. <JA...@th...> - 2006-05-26 15:50:10
|
Very true, I had assumed that already worked. Fixed fix attached. Jim "Nat Pryce" <nat...@gm...>=20 Sent by: nmo...@li... 26/05/2006 15:11 Please respond to nmo...@li... To nmo...@li... cc Subject Re: [NMock2-Dev] BUG: Cannot stub on properties returning value types Shouldn't a default value be generated for value types results of *any* method, not just property getters? --Nat. On 5/26/06, Jim Arnold <JA...@th...> wrote: > As the subject says. The fix and tests are attached. > > I seem to remember fixing some very similar bugs in NMock 1 - can't we > just re-use the proxy code from there or, better yet, use the Castle=20 Proxy > framework? The System.Remoting.Proxy stuff is really limited, is a pain > to debug, and we're reinventing stuff that's been done several times > before. No offense Nat :) > > Jim > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=107521&bid$8729&dat=121642 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F NMock-two-dev mailing list NMo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev |