[NMock2-Dev] Re: Using NMock2 Matchers with Assert

[Nat P. <nat...@gm...>]

Hi Charlie (and nmock-2 dev).  I have no problem with this.  However,
Joe has started to factor out the constraints/matchers from various
projects (jMock, nMock, etc) into a new project that is intended, one
day, to be shared between them and other uses.  Joe: could Charlie
join or use that?

As for licensing, NMock2 is under a BSD style of license.  Personally,
I prefer copyleft licenses because they are more business friendly and
protect end users, but I'm not sure how copyleft and BSD can be
combined.

--Nat.

On 5/25/06, Charlie Poole <ch...@po...> wrote:
> Hi Nat,
>
> I'd like to have an Assert.That syntax for both NUnit and NUnitLite. If w=
e
> can use your project's code, I'd as soon do that. Otherwise, we'll just b=
e
> inspired by you. :-)
>
> For NUnitLite - which would use it first - we would need to add the relev=
ant
> source files to our project. For NUnit, depending on when you go to a ful=
l
> release, we could either do it the same way or follow up with the
> long-standing plan to replace our mock framework with NMock.
>
> How do you guys feel this would work in terms of licensing? I read the
> thread where you were discussing a license and I never saw anyone actuall=
y
> answer the question of what you wanted to achieve with the license you
> chose. BTW, NUnitLite will be copyleft - there's even a good chance it wi=
ll
> be GPL or LGPL. NUnit will stay what it is, at least until we do a fresh
> start with 3.0.
>
> Feel free to take this to your discussion list if you like.
>
> Charlie
>
>
>