Re: [NMock2-Dev] Website content first cut - please comment

[Joe R. <joe...@gm...>]

I was thinking about the maintenance issue with two versions when I
wrote the email.  It was easy to suggest since I wouldn't be
maintaining it :-)

Anyway, I do feel making it more printable will make it more useful.=20
I've currently taken the PDF version and jotted the differences on it
in pen.

Keep up the great work,
-joe

On 3/6/06, Mike Mason <mik...@gm...> wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Joe Ross <joe...@gm...> wrote:
> > In reference to the cheatsheet...
> >
> > There's a slightly different PDF version of this document here [1].
> > I'm not sure which one came first, but the PDF version prints much
> > nicer than HTML as expected.  The two differences between the
> > documents that jump out at me are the .NET 2.0 addition to "Setting
> > Up" and the change from ".Verify" to
> > ".VerifyAllExpectationsHaveBeenMet" in the "Verification"
> section.
> >
> > Is there any way to update the PDF and use that in addition to the HTML
> version?
> >
>
> The PDF source is a Word document that Kerry Todyruik put together, and h=
e
> did a PDF export of it. I'm not too keen on keeping two versions in sync =
but
> I think we can get the HTML to print nicely -- the jMock site (on which o=
urs
> is based) has a "print" CSS style attached to it. I think the NMock site
> also has this but the stylesheet needs to be fixed up.
>
> I'll try and fix the stylesheet so it prints nicely from a browser,
> hopefully this will be good enough for most uses.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike.
>