|
From: Mike M. <mik...@gm...> - 2006-02-15 17:37:18
|
On 2/15/06, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > The jMock license has the same condition. I think we just reworded > the Apache license. It was a long time ago. I think that's fine. > Having the same license for both projects is probably a good thing. > Nat would you mind adding the license to the CVS repository? I think it's good for the original author to be adding the license rather than some hanger-on such as myself. Just bung a LICENSE.txt at the root of the nmock2 module and I'll pull that in to the website docs and maybe the source files (although I've always found wading through license text in source files a pain). Cheers, Mike. |