Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock 2.0 License

[Nat P. <nat...@gm...>]

The jMock license has the same condition.  I think we just reworded
the Apache license.  It was a long time ago.  I think that's fine.=20
Having the same license for both projects is probably a good thing.

-- Nat.

On 2/15/06, Mike Mason <mik...@gm...> wrote:
> On 2/15/06, Mike Mason <mik...@gm...> wrote:
> > Is there a license that is stricter about people not ripping off the co=
de
> but that is not GPL?
> >
>
> Sorry to reply to myself. Apache 2.0 looks like if you mess with the code
> and redistribute it you have to credit the original authors and prominent=
ly
> notify people that you changed the software. Mozilla 1.1 seems to include
> this as well, although it's much more wordy and contains stuff about
> "developers" vs "contributors":
>
> http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php
> http://opensource.org/licenses/mozilla1.1.php
>
> Cheers,
> Mike.
>
>