Re: [NMock2-Dev] NMock2 website current status

[Paul G. <pau...@gm...>]

Simply highlighting an issue worthy of consideration. I agree, enforcing it
would be a nightmare, and I don't think they should try. But they do have
some rights, however minor. Personally I think their vicarious IP agreement
stinks, but it is what it is.

Now who got out of bed the wrong side? ;)

Paul

On 15/02/06, Stephen Freeman <st...@m3...> wrote:
>
> Actually, I seem to remember some exclusions at the time to allow
> open source working. And most of the origins of the work was done
> before people joined up because /after/ we joined up many of us were
> wrung dry by our projects. And some of the contributions from TW
> employees were derived from XtC discussions with non-TW employees.
> I'd love to see the mess if TW tried to enforce anything.
>
> So, did we get out of bed on the wrong side this morning?
>
> S.
>
> On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:51, Paul Gale wrote:
> > AFAIK, for as long as you were on the TW payroll they have ALL
> > intellectual
> > property rights associated with any work you do whether it be done
> > on your
> > own time and/or your own machine or not. They own said IP. Folks keep
> > forgetting that. Therefore they have the right to have their name
> > displayed
> > anyway and anywhere they want if any contributions were made to the
> > project
> > by active ThoughtWorkers. This is ofcourse, only if they wanted to get
> > snippy about it, but you shouldn't ignore it. So the fact that TW
> > did not
> > put up any cash for its implementation is not the issue.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On 15/02/06, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/15/06, Stephen Freeman <st...@m3...> wrote:
> >>> If TW has actually provided people with time (which I don't remember
> >>> happening in London) then that should be recognised, and we can
> >>> put a
> >>> link up but not a dominating one.
> >>
> >> I agree.  If (and only if) TW has funded people to do this then they
> >> should be attributed on the team page.
> >>
> >> --Nat.
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
> >> log
> >> files
> >> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> >> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
> >> SPLUNK!
> >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> >> NMo...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
> >>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> NMock-two-dev mailing list
> NMo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev
>