|
From: Stephen F. <st...@m3...> - 2006-02-15 17:02:19
|
Actually, I seem to remember some exclusions at the time to allow =20 open source working. And most of the origins of the work was done =20 before people joined up because /after/ we joined up many of us were =20 wrung dry by our projects. And some of the contributions from TW =20 employees were derived from XtC discussions with non-TW employees. =20 I'd love to see the mess if TW tried to enforce anything. So, did we get out of bed on the wrong side this morning? S. On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:51, Paul Gale wrote: > AFAIK, for as long as you were on the TW payroll they have ALL =20 > intellectual > property rights associated with any work you do whether it be done =20 > on your > own time and/or your own machine or not. They own said IP. Folks keep > forgetting that. Therefore they have the right to have their name =20 > displayed > anyway and anywhere they want if any contributions were made to the =20= > project > by active ThoughtWorkers. This is ofcourse, only if they wanted to get > snippy about it, but you shouldn't ignore it. So the fact that TW =20 > did not > put up any cash for its implementation is not the issue. > > Paul > > On 15/02/06, Nat Pryce <nat...@gm...> wrote: >> >> On 2/15/06, Stephen Freeman <st...@m3...> wrote: >>> If TW has actually provided people with time (which I don't remember >>> happening in London) then that should be recognised, and we can =20 >>> put a >>> link up but not a dominating one. >> >> I agree. If (and only if) TW has funded people to do this then they >> should be attributed on the team page. >> >> --Nat. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20= >> log >> files >> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD =20 >> SPLUNK! >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> NMock-two-dev mailing list >> NMo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nmock-two-dev >> |