Menu

#5 Scripting Support

open
5
2014-07-23
2003-04-12
No

define operators, variables etc. in external scripts, either
in extended math.net infix notation or directly in
any .NET language like C# or VB.NET.

also interesting would be the possibility to store and
load the current variables in a parsing demo like session.

Discussion

  • Rana Ian

    Rana Ian - 2004-09-10

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=553302

    Possible tie in to MathML 2.0?

    http://www.w3.org/Math/

     
  • Christoph Ruegg

    Christoph Ruegg - 2004-09-10

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=241150

    Yes, would be interesting. MathML is planned as a rendering
    format anyway (additional to the existing infix and LaTeX
    notations), but I don't know MathML 2 in detail yet. Adding a
    new MathML Layer to the exitsting infix parser schould be
    doable in time however, using the Framework's XML
    infrastructure.

     
  • TParker

    TParker - 2004-09-18

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1119194

    There is a book called 'Building Java Parsers" that could
    provide a baseline to what is wanted. A basic mathematical
    parser could be allowed to take in XML, console, or
    file "script" input and produce a result.

     
  • Christoph Ruegg

    Christoph Ruegg - 2004-09-18

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=241150

    Parsers are not a problem, we already have a complete parser
    infrastructure (I completely rewrote my old infix parser,
    see MathNet.Symbolic.Parser) ... MathML could be parsed with
    the builtin XML parser, what is missing is the
    transformation from the xml tree to MathNet expression
    structures (that's where the detailed knowledge about the
    MathML specs comes in) ...

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.