From: Ricardo P. (JIRA) <nh...@gm...> - 2011-05-23 13:31:00
|
[ http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=21152#action_21152 ] Ricardo Peres commented on NH-1930: ----------------------------------- Same happens when specifying a where clause on a set using fetch mode join. I think the restriction should be placed on the join on clause, not the global where. > Filter condition on nullable many to one should be on the join, not the where > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: NH-1930 > URL: http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1930 > Project: NHibernate > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.1.0.GA > Reporter: Ayende Rahien > Assignee: Ayende Rahien > Priority: Major > > Using the code in NH-1919, get produces the following values for nullable property that has a filter on it: > SELECT invoice0_.id AS id1_1_, > invoice0_.otherprop AS otherprop1_1_, > invoice0_.categoryid AS categoryid1_1_, > category1_.id AS id0_0_, > category1_.validuntil AS validuntil0_0_ > FROM invoice invoice0_ > LEFT OUTER JOIN category category1_ > ON invoice0_.categoryid = category1_.id > WHERE category1_.validuntil > @p0 > AND invoice0_.id = @p1 > The problem is that the filter should be applied on the join, not on the where, since it filter the parent as well as the child. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://216.121.112.228/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |