ng4j-namedgraphs

[namedgraphs] Updated jenatest

[Tim P. <ti...@pa...>]

Hi,

Yesterday I did not figure out where the jenattest jar had got to.
It is now known as jena-2.6.2-tests.jar

That our main code is dependent upon a test jar should be fixed.

The CI kicked in http://hudson.paneris.net/job/ng4j/43/console
so http://paneris.net/ng4j/dependencies.html is now up to date.

cheers
Tim

Re: [namedgraphs] Updated jenatest

[Olaf H. <ha...@in...>]

Hey Tim,

Did you miss some of the JARs updated in the Jena 2.6.2 package when you 
upgraded the Jena in NG4J to 2.6.2?
I don't find information about your upgrade in lib/LIBRARIES.txt

Greetings,
Olaf

Re: [namedgraphs] Updated jenatest

[Tim P. <ti...@pa...>]

Hi Olaf,

I looked lib/LIBRARIES.txt but it appears to be outdated now, as it is about
our previous upgrade. However I have now upgraded it.

I did upgrade some jars, it is a shame we do not have commit
notification emails enabled,
but from memory, and by inspection, I see jena-2.6.2.jar and
jena-2.6.2-tests.jar

Comparing http://paneris.net/ng4j/dependencies.html with contents of lib
I see that I overlooked, and have now updated, iri-0.6 to iri-0.7 and
arq-2.8.0 to arq-2.8.2

In addition we have an unused, transitive, dependency upon
lucene-core-2.3.1 which I have added.

These changes have kicked off a CI build and all passes.

I think that this additional work, of maintaining the lib directory
and its documentation, is a reason to drop the ant build.

cheers
Tim



On 19 February 2010 15:16, Olaf Hartig  wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> Did you miss some of the JARs updated in the Jena 2.6.2 package when you
> upgraded the Jena in NG4J to 2.6.2?
> I don't find information about your upgrade in lib/LIBRARIES.txt
>
> Greetings,
> Olaf

Re: [namedgraphs] Updated jenatest

[Olaf H. <ha...@in...>]

Hey,

I created a package of the NG4J 0.9.3 release and uploaded it to SourceForge.

On Friday 19 February 2010 17:33:36 Tim Pizey wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
> 
> I looked lib/LIBRARIES.txt but it appears to be outdated now, as it is
>  about our previous upgrade. However I have now upgraded it.

Thanks.

> [...]
> I think that this additional work, of maintaining the lib directory
> and its documentation, is a reason to drop the ant build.

No, I still use ant to build NG4J and I guess I'm not the only one.
I don't think it is that much work replacing the relevant JARs in the lib 
directory and adjusting the LIBRARIES.txt file if one upgrades the libs
used by NG4J.

Olaf

Re: [namedgraphs] Updated jenatest

[Tim P. <ti...@pa...>]

Hi Olaf,

On 25 February 2010 15:05, Olaf Hartig  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I created a package of the NG4J 0.9.3 release and uploaded it to SourceForge.

Cool.

I have just updated webmacro, by restructuring its CVS repository see
http://tim-pizey.blogspot.com/2010/02/bringing-webmacro-up-for-air.html

We might want to do a similar restructure to ng4j.

I have also found out about how to create and deploy the release
bundle in Maven.
I would also recommend deploying our artefact to
http://ng4j.sourceforge.net/maven2/
however this currently relocates to
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/ng4j/maven2/

About ant - just winging.

cheers
Tim