From: Olaf H. <ha...@in...> - 2009-06-10 12:56:57
|
Hey, @Jennifer: Thanks a lot to initiate this!!! On Wednesday 10 June 2009 12:42:01 Tim Pizey wrote: > On Tuesday 09 June 2009 23:26:13 Jennifer Cormier wrote: > > The initial reason for the wiki is that it was getting too complicated to > > track the changes planned for upcoming releases. Now there's a page for > > the next release - Post 0.9 Release Plans - accessible from the wiki's > > Main Page. > > This all looks good, and not a lot to actually fix, much of it seems to > already be done, or to be the sort of thing which it is quicker to do than > to document. > > Lets get this one out of the door so that we can focus on catching up with > current jena. Definitely agree! Regarding GRDDL: GRDDL does not seem to be used much in the wild. Furthermore, GRDDL has some kind of being obsoleted by RDFa. And, the GRDDL support in SWClLib is currently not actively maintained by anyone. I don't know how to stress test the GRDDL support. So I couldn't really say whether the use of the latest grddl.jar breaks anything. For these reasons, Richard and me came to the conclusion to deprecate GRDDL support in SWClLib. This means the coming NG4J release will be the last that contains GRDDL support unless someone steps up to maintain it. Given this decision, I am unsure whether it makes sense to update the grddl.jar provided with NG4J. Are there any reasons why we should use the latest grddl.jar in the new release? Otherwise, I suggest to leave everything as it is. Greetings, Olaf |