From: Mark J. <mj...@we...> - 2005-12-08 06:21:56
|
Last week I updated my changes to 'netron/netrontry2' and would be interested in learning if any conflicts have accured. No more changes are planned at this point (the Font problem still being, and will probably remain, unresolved). Have all other inclusions been merged to this Version ? Should the Cobolt Portion be included ? What final name should be chosen ? My suggestion would be something like 'netron_F11' with a 'netron_F20' for a Framework 2.0 coming later. Francois Vanderseypen sagt: the name is fine for me Once everything is in, I would 'checkout' the last Version and check it out with my code. If everything then works for all, we could the make a general announcement with the final Name (also updating the CVS-Page from 'NAF' to the new name) with this being the present Framework 1.1 Version of Netron. Mark |