Re: [Netrik-general] Re: Roadmap

[Patrice N. <mai...@pa...>]

Hello Olaf,

> > > Is that to say, you do not like the present one? ;-)
> > 
> > It's not a bad start. :-)
> 
> WRONG answer! try again ;-)

Does "it's very good for the beginning" work? :)

> For the same reason, any solutions using own libraries are completely
> inacceptable; we use getopt_long(), and nothing more. (getopt_long() is
> OK, because it's quite small, and on a GNU system it's already in RAM
> anyhow...)

That's ok for me.

> (Especially config file handling needn't be very sophisticated, as it is
> only a temporary solution anyhow...)

Are you planning any secret feature which makes config files obsolete?
;-)

I'm currently implementing a command line handling in the netrik
code. I don't think that an option "debug" makes any sense, because
this debug code should certainly stay out of any final binary. But I'm
trying to implement the other options in the makefile and will put the
result into CVS as soon as I have a nice version. But don't expect too
much as this is my first code using getopt_long(). It doesn't look too
difficult but you never know...

patrice

-- 
Of course a platonic relationship is possible -- but only between
husband and wife.