Re: [netrexx-pipelines] LOCATE Stage name abbreviation: No

[<hp...@we...>]

Hello René!

Am 26.06.2022 um 13:44 schrieb rvj...@xs...:
> Maybe surprising, but we do not have those rules, yet.

Yes. But... no, not surprising. My idea about rules of precedence
is biased by contractual stipulations, where it may help in cases
of self-contradictory. Here, defining NetRexx Pipelines, it might
be favourable to discuss every case and find a good solution. John
did sometimes similar and asked on [CMS-PIPELINES].

> My intention is to be as close to the 2015 release of CMS/TSO Pipelines, because that is what is downloadable from Marist and runs on all versions of VM/ESA 2.4-z/VM 7.2, where that level became the standard from z/VM 6.04 on. So: accessible for the home/amateur user and the professional level with current releases.
>
> On the other hand, because of the fact that Jeff did a ton of work on it, and certainly understands it better than I do, I am inclined to respect his judgement here. We can even start a user group and have a poll on it.

Sure, nothing against it. Polls are so much democratic. But,
please, consider for what query you call all NetRexx Pipelines
user to the ballot box: "Should it be possible to abbreviate the
stage 'Locate' down to a single character 'L' exactly like the
role model? -- Accept or decline?" Reminds me a bit this old ad:
https://youtu.be/MyGUrPxG1iM ;)

Best,
M.